RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04080
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to all his dependents, not just his daughter, while on active duty.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He filed for the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) for all his eligible dependents according to provided guidelines. Although he complied with all the prerequisites for the TEB to his eligible dependents, benefits were only transferred to his daughter as his remaining dependents names were eliminated. He was made aware that many military members who were first to use the system in 2009, later discovered their dependents were eliminated from the system without cause.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 1 Jul 10, the applicant was retired in the grade of master sergeant (E-7).
According to NGB/A1Y, on 26 Jul 09, the applicant applied for TEB and transferred benefits to his daughter.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application is described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1Y recommends denial, indicating the applicant did not transfer benefits to all his eligible dependents prior to retirement in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1341.13. Specifically, an individual may not add family members after retirement or separation but may modify the number of months of the transferred entitlement or revoke transfer of entitlement after retirement or separation for those family members who have received transferred benefits prior to separation or retirement. This information was published on government-hosted websites prior to the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicants Post 9/11 GI Bill program manager for the Air National Guard (ANG), at the time of his retirement, indicated all members out-processing through her office received a Post 9/11 GI Bill separations briefing and emphasis was made to transfer at least one month of benefits to each eligible dependent. They were further briefed that once they retire or separate, dependents not previously designated to receive transferred benefits, were ineligible at a later date. She further indicated that copies of separation checklists were not kept; therefore, she does not have a record of the applicant out-processing through her office. Nevertheless, the applicants current Post-9/11 GI Bill program manager for the Air National Guard (ANG) indicated the TEB website showed the applicant only transferred benefits to his daughter on 26 Jul 09. Although his son met the criteria to receive transferred benefits, the applicant must have transferred at least one month of benefits to his son prior to his retirement for eligibility of TEB. As such, the applicant is not authorized to add his son to his current TEB request. If the decision is to grant the relief sought, the applicants records should be corrected to show he transferred benefits on 30 Jun 10.
The complete copy of the NGB/A1Y evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant argues he added all his eligible dependents prior to his retirement; however, only one of his dependents appeared on the listing. He was informed that there are many cases of dependents being dropped or missing, especially those military members that were the first to use the systems in 2009. He further argues that although he applied for the Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits in 2009 for his dependents, through no fault of his own, three of his four dependents are not accounted for to receive the Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits. However, at this time, he is requesting the correction of his records because his son in college has very limited financial aid, and without the Post-9/11 GI Bill benefit, he will be forced to leave school.
A complete copy of the applicants response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The applicant contends there were systemic technical difficulties at play during the early stages of the Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer of education benefits (TEB) program which caused his TEB elections to not process properly. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, to include his rebuttal response, we believe that corrective action is warranted. While noting the recommendation of the Air Force OPR to deny the applicants request, we are aware that problems occurred during the early stages of implementing the TEB program that adversely impacted the ability of eligible participants to transfer benefits to their dependents. Given the timeframe of the applicants efforts to transfer benefits to his dependents, we find it reasonable that actions beyond his control prevented a successful transfer of benefits. We further note, if the recommendation is to grant relief, the OPR recommends the effective date for the TEB should be 30 Jun 10. However, we find sufficient evidence to conclude it was the applicants intent to transfer entitlement of educational benefits to all his eligible dependents on the effective date of his original election dated 26 Jul 09. Therefore, we recommend the applicants records be corrected as indicated below.
4. The applicants case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 26 Jul 2009, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his dependents.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04080 in Executive Session on 1 Jul 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04080 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Aug 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1Y, dated 3 Oct 13, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Nov 13.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 11 Dec 13, w/atch.
4
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01110
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01110 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred at least one month of his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his daughter while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01355
Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003- Post-9/11 GI Bill, 22 Jun 2009, (reissued 14 Sep 2011) attachment 2, paragraph 3g (2) (a) 2 states: "An individual may not add dependents after retirement or separation from the Armed Forces, but may modify the number of months of the transferred benefit after retirement or separation for those dependents who had received transferred benefits prior to separation or retirement." To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01867
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01867 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits from one of his dependents to another. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00585
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00585 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits to his dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01457
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He attempted to transfer his benefits to both of his sons before he retired. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends approval if the Board finds an injustice. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00973
He was never told of the requirement to transfer his educational benefits either while serving, when sign up for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, or as he went through the retirement process. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01270
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01270 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. He requests that the TEB be corrected to reflect his daughter and the 18 months of VA benefits he allocated to her in Aug 2009. He retired in Jun 2011 and submitted his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01346
The complete NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In an undated letter the applicant responds that he is submitting the letter to provide further explanation of his request to accomplish the Post 9/11 TEB. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends approval if the Board finds an injustice. However, based on the applicant's complete submission, we find no...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02569
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Prior to his retirement in Sept 09 he submitted a request online through his personnel office to transfer his Post 9/11-GI Bill Education Benefits to his children. The applicant states, that the OPR is correct in that he was briefed on the Post 9/11-GI Bill and the process to transfer his educational benefits. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 1 Sep 09, he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02017
Therefore, he was entitled to benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill program in his own right. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application is described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends approval, indicating there is no evidence the applicant received guidance on the Post 9/11 GI Bill or instructions to...